The Hawk's Herald

When you wear yoga pants, I can see your vagina

By BEN WHITMORE

Published: Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Updated: Thursday, November 17, 2011

There are many things I do not like about Roger Williams University. For starters, I don't like that most RWU students appear to not place value on education. I don't like that many professors reward under-researched, inarticulate, and thoughtless work with pass­ing grades, rather than calling students on their bunk junk. I don't like that some University administrators make policy de­cisions based on how perceived outcomes would make the Uni­versity look rather than how the student population and the quality of their education will benefit. I don't like that I am in the same senior class with a girl who asked a friend in the library the other day, "Wait, where is the Supreme Court? Like, is there more than one?"

Yet, I understand that RWU's flaws are not unique to the school; the world is full of people who have views and be­haviors that I don't personally agree with. I have made peace with the good, the bad, and the ugly at RWU, and I will be proudly walking across the stage in May and getting my diploma with the University's name on it.

However, there is one school trend that I can no longer remain silent about, one article of clothing that most female students wear that makes me ashamed to be a fellow class­mate of theirs.

I hate yoga pants.

I've heard that what I refer to as yoga pants, some consider to be "leggings." I'll elimi­nate confusion by offering a Jeff Foxworthy-esque defini­tion: you might be wearing yoga pants if you are wearing form-fitting spandex tights and it is rainy out, or you need a self-esteem boost, or you are fulfilling exhibitionist desires, or you don't know how else to express your sexuality, or if you are wearing attire that is so skin-tight and so form-fitting that I can see your vagina.

There, I said it.

Yes, ladies of RWU, when you wear yoga pants and your shirt stops at your waist, I can see your lady parts.

Yoga pants do not count as real pants; they, unlike actual pants, reveal the intimate cur­vature of women's bodies with unabashed honesty.

Yoga pants are opaque nudity.

Now, I refuse to be called a pervert for noticing that sex organ of yours that is separated from me by only a thin layer of spandex. I am not asking for you to show me; you are show­ing me and asking me not to look. There is a difference.

And also, I understand that yoga pants are soooo frickin' comfy and that because other women wear them, you get secret female style points for publicly demonstrating your ability to be a part of a trend. I respect your right to be comfortable and to earn these points.

But I still don't like them, and I don't like how many women on this campus wear them.

I wonder, women, when you wear yoga pants, why you don't just wear a shirt, or a sweater, or a vest, or a jacket, or some article of clothing that is long enough to reach below your waist. Why is the trend to wear spandex-based, highly form-fitting pants, and not to cover your privates?

Don't you remember that scene from Little Miss Sun­shine? About a specific part of a camel's foot? About the embar­rassment? The awkwardness?

That's how I feel when I see you.

And it is an embarrassment and awkwardness fraught with mixed emotions. There are an abundance of very attrac­tive women on campus and, I must admit, I don't think yoga pants are all bad. Yoga pants make butts look good, and I can't truly blame you yoga-pant wearers for wanting to flaunt. Part of me is, at heart, a yoga pants fan.

But the rest of me stubbornly objects. I can't help but feel that women who wear yoga pants have a false modesty that says, "I want to show off my body, but I am too embarrassed to be overtly sexual, so I will just wear skin-tight, curve-revealing clothing to satisfy my exhibitionist desires in socially acceptable means."

There's nothing wrong with personal empowerment, but there is something phony about the way women seem to do it by wearing yoga pants.

I get the sense that women wear yoga pants to feel sexy without getting judged as a slut, yet I see something demeaning in women wear­ing yoga pants and parading around their half-silhouetted vaginas all day.

I sincerely encourage you, ladies of RWU, to feel sexy and be comfortable in your own skin. But please realize this: when you are immodestly flaunting your body by wearing next-to-nothing clothes and thinking that you're still keep­ing it classy, the joke is on you.

Comments

35 comments
Anonymous
Fri Nov 25 2011 18:13
Nailed it Ben! It's almost funnier to read the ignorant RWU students trying to formulate a complete sentence to represent their incoherent and incompetent viewpoints. Ben, you are my new hero and my girlfriend and I will have your back 100%!
bookwench
Sun Nov 20 2011 22:57
Yoga pants are sweatpants without the elastic on the ankles. If you can see female anatomy through them you are a medical miracle. Leggings are leggings. There's just the one word for them, unless they have feet, in which case they become tights. If they're sheer and have a tighter waistband, they become nylons.

I know, paying attention to clothing is so shallow! After all, who cares what the proper technical term is for any one article of attire? Now wrap those boxers around your neck before you go out, son, it's chilly outside.

Anonymous
Sun Nov 20 2011 11:37
and in other news from Roger Williams University:

Hawk's Herald staff writer, Ben Whitmore, comes screaming out of the closet.

Anonymous
Sun Nov 20 2011 10:16
lmao at the feninazis saying they are all for free speech but then saying people should be punished for free speech. you morons realize, of course, that if you feel people should be punished for free speech you really don't believe in free speech? The measure of a country's freedom of speech is not how well it defends popular speech, but how well it defends unpopular speech. Not a hard concept to grasp, but I'm not surprised a couple of dumb broads find that hard to grasp. As for the article, what new level of moron would cry out against women wearing yoga pants?
Anonymous
Sun Nov 20 2011 03:28
Oooooh . . . you stepped in it now.

See, a woman can show you her whoo-hoo, but it's sexist for you to notice. Doesn't work in reverse, though. It's kinda like the n-word: That's THEIR thing.

Anonymous
Sun Nov 20 2011 01:48
Ur gay dude.
Anonymous
Sat Nov 19 2011 21:38
Wow, are you auditioning for Andy Rooney's homosexual replacement?
Anonymous
Sat Nov 19 2011 20:32
This article is worthless without pictures.
Anonymous
Sat Nov 19 2011 20:25
Wow. Why the hate on for Ben. He's stating a truth. Some clothing - like yoga pants - is more revealing. He's basically asking if the people wearing this clothing are fully aware of the implications. If so, then fine. If not, perhaps this is just clarification for them as to how it affects others.

Are those of you attacking him upset because you wear these pants and disagree with him? If so, deal with his arguments and don't use ad hominem attacks.

Wastrel
Sat Nov 19 2011 14:43
And you have a problem with this... why? Perhaps you don't realize that our man-parts are similarly 'visible' to a woman who uses her imagination, and most of them do.
Anonymous
Sat Nov 19 2011 13:36
I agree with the author. It's a really bad look, mostly because only 5% of women out there can really pull it off right. The other 95% are copy-cats who either don't understand the look and/or don't have the right bodies for it.

Or as the old song goes: "Fix yourself girl, you've got a cameltoe."

Anonymous
Sat Nov 19 2011 13:01
Honestly? Get over it. If a group of brainless sluts want to advertise the fact that they are brainless sluts, let them. The only people who care are the ones who would willingly interact with these sluts. Same goes for nudists. They're going to do what they're going to do, and it's none of your business. Yes, they know they're displaying their genitals like prize cuts of meat at a market. They don't care. And if they don't care that they're cheapening their bodies, why should you? It's none of your business.

The only reason I can think of for you to get upset over this is if you're still in that adolescent-phase where you automatically let your eyes size up the genitals and/or mammaries of every female you meet. I know a lot of boys never grow out of that and become men. Though if you're still in the phase of 'ooh, lookit her girly-parts!', I'm not sure why having the object of your obsession presented to you on a silver platter is a bad thing.

Anonymous
Sat Nov 19 2011 00:04
Is it really an awkwardness fraught with mixed emotions? You are such a tool.
Anonymous
Fri Nov 18 2011 23:59
Hey sweetie, shut the f up. You are standing up for this kid? The one who called you and your friends sluts and is completely disrespectful towards women. By the way, no one cares what you opinion on fashion is. Long-ish top? You sound like an idiot. Ben, sucks to be you.
Anonymous
Fri Nov 18 2011 17:34
i'm a girl and i agree with him. while i wear yoga pants myself, i wear them with a long shirt/sweater/something that doesn't expose my butt. girls need to learn that leggings ARE NOT PANTS. i repeat. THEY ARE NOT PANTS. they're something you wear under a long-ish top. if you're wearing skin tight yoga pants and a tank top, uhh ya you do look like a slut. sorry, sweetie.
LoserBen
Fri Nov 18 2011 16:25
Dude it's Roger Williams Univ, the safety school for people to stupid to score high on the Math portion of the SATs
Anonymous
Fri Nov 18 2011 16:00
He has a right to speak his mind, he has the right to disagree with a fashion statement, he has the right to his opinion.. but he has no right to be sexist, or at least not in print. The point is not whether or not leggings are ridiculous, sure they are. The point is that this child was allowed the right to put a demeaning article that is blatantly sexist in a newspaper... and get away with it. Just like you cant say "nappy headed..." its all freedom of speech but that was racist and those individuals were punished. To write an article that demeans woman like that is disgusting. Both Ben and the Hawks Harold should be ashamed.
Anonymous
Fri Nov 18 2011 15:48
he's right though. It's only a trend. Girls do look ridiculous when it's 30 degrees out and they'll keep their feet warm in their ugg boots, their scarves, mittens and heavy winter coats but leggings in winter is clearly a fashion statement. he has the right to speak his mind.
Anonymous
Fri Nov 18 2011 15:43
Honestly this is a terrible miscarriage of free speech. First and foremost how can a newspaper actually be okay with printing this article with all of its sexist undertones. Being an alumni from RWU who frequently wore and still today wears yoga pants I would like to say this 1) I am not nor was I a slut, which you so kindly inferred 2) I worked hard for my GPA 3) I was not a spoiled little rich girl I had to work and now have loans 4) I had some of the most wonderful professors who did not feel the need to give students grades they didn't deserve....

Its really sad that with everything going on in our world today, debt ceilings, up-coming elections, OC Wall street etc that this article was even printed. Go get a blog and put your childish, ignorant, immature thoughts there. Hawks Herald you clearly took 50 steps backwards on your credibility as a newspaper.

I'm sure woman in the middle east and other countries where they aren't allowed to show their face would be happy to live in a country that allowed them the write to wear what they want and not get beaten for it; which sir you clearly support.

And finally if you really are so tired of a school that to you just pushes people through for stats or whatever else you cried about maybe you should just do the one thing that most people do when they're unhappy.... TRANSFER!

I hope people boycott the Hawks Herald and Ben Whitmore for that matter.

Anonymous
Fri Nov 18 2011 15:38
What a loser this kid is. Yoga pants are amazing. I would be ashamed to be this guy's father, brother or friend.
View full site